Project Management Process
Evolution from Agile, to scaled agile
From team to enterprise management
Evolution from Agile, to scaled agile
From team to enterprise management
Evaluate Agile adoption across teams/orgs
Identify gaps in mindset, practices, delivery
Guide continuous improvement and scaling
1. Spotify Health Check
Squad-level; focus on culture, autonomy, tech health
Scale: 0–5 or color-coded
Lightweight, self-assessed
2. Agile Fluency Model
Focus on value vs. capability investment
Stages: Focusing → Delivering → Optimizing → Strengthening
Diagnostic + strategic tool
3. SAFe Assessments
Covers team, leadership, business agility
Format: Likert scale
Best for large enterprises using SAFe
4. Generic Agile Maturity Model (AMM)
Levels 1–5: Initial → Optimizing
Focus: People, Process, Tools, Culture
Widely used in audits/consulting
Team agility, CI/CD, leadership, customer focus, adaptability, metrics
JIRA Align, AgilityHealth, Miro/Mural, Excel checklists, surveys
Drives cultural shift toward agility.
Aligns Agile adoption with strategy.
Ensures resources & avoids micromanagement.
Owns the product vision and prioritizes the backlog.
Acts as the main link between business and development.
Ensures delivery of maximum value.
Facilitates Agile practices and removes impediments.
Trains and coaches the team.
Promotes servant leadership, not command-control.
Responsible for executing Agile work.
Self-organizing, cross-functional team(Including PO,TL,Dev team, FE Team, UX team, and quality team)
Delivers working software in short cycles (sprints).
As I said: “Agile is not a tool; it’s a culture that starts at the top and flows through all levels.”
Mindset & Culture
Focus on values (e.g., customer collaboration, adaptability)
Teams embrace change, work iteratively, and improve continuously
Aligned with Agile Manifesto principles
Example: “We prioritize value, even if that means changing sprint scope.”
Deliverable-oriented mindsets: So, once the team says we will have analysis sprint, design sprint, and implementation sprint, they are working waterfall using agile.
Team (Rugby) deliverables instead of individualism: So once you see the team is sending emails to each other in front of management, we have issue in the mindset.
Following practices like Scrum, Kanban, stand-ups, Jira boards
Focus on process over principles
May become mechanical or checklist-driven
Example: “We do daily stand-ups and sprints, but never talk to users”
Myth: SAFe is designed only for large enterprises with hundreds of people.
Reality: While it’s popular in large organizations, SAFe can be scaled down for smaller setups with just a few Agile teams, since you are managing large-scale projects, with smaller teams, but you need these practices for managing such large projects
Myth: SAFe is rigid and bureaucratic, like waterfall in disguise.
Reality: SAFe has structured roles/events, but still relies on Agile principles, practices, adaptive planning, and continuous improvement, as it should exist at team level
Myth: Implementation requires starting with Portfolio, Solution, and Program levels together.
Reality: You can start small (Essential SAFe) and expand as needed, level by level, mandatory at the team level, then program, solution, and portfolio, according to your organization's level.
Myth: All decisions are centralized at the program or portfolio level.
Reality: SAFe encourages decentralized decision-making and team-level ownership, especially in execution. We have discussed what should be centralized and what should be decentralized. As strategic and long-term decisions should be centralized at the management level, it's actually a management decision, while others are team-level decisions.
Myth: You just follow SAFe ceremonies and you’re done.
Reality: Success depends on Lean-Agile mindset, leadership support, and cultural change—not just process compliance.
Myth: Teams abandon their current Agile methods when adopting SAFe.
Reality: SAFe builds on frameworks like Scrum, Kanban, and XP at the team level.
Myth: Teams can implement SAFe bottom-up.
Reality: Leadership engagement is critical, especially for funding models, governance, and organizational alignment, as SAFe is concerned with large-scale teams and projects, so the core focus on team harmony, and organizational practices, and support program, solution, and portfolio levels, so management support is mandatory.
Dr. Ghoniem Lawaty
Tech Evangelist